Which sequence best reflects a Gottman approach to solving a solvable problem?

Which sequence best reflects a Gottman approach to solving a solvable problem?

• A. Propose solutions; State the problem; Implement immediately; Review after a set period.
• B. State the problem clearly; Develop several solutions; Evaluate options with pros/cons; Choose one; Implement; Review after a set period; Use repair attempts if needed.
• C. Ignore the problem; Wait for it to resolve itself; Reassess in a year.
• D. Decide unilaterally; Implement; Evaluate; Repair attempts after issues.

Answer: (B)

In Gottman theory, solvable problems are tackled with a collaborative problem-solving sequence that keeps both partners engaged and respected. Start by stating the problem clearly in terms you both can agree on, which sets a neutral ground and reduces misunderstandings. Then brainstorm several possible solutions together, inviting input from both sides so you get a range of options rather than rushing to one fix. Next, evaluate each option by weighing its pros and cons, so you can make a choice that balances needs for both partners. After that, pick one solution to try and implement it, then review how it went after a set period. This review lets you decide whether to keep the plan, adjust it, or try a new approach. Throughout the process, repair attempts are available to de-escalate tension and keep the discussion constructive if things begin to get heated or misaligned. This sequence fits Gottman’s approach because it emphasizes joint problem definition, exploration of multiple solutions, deliberate decision-making, and timely evaluation, all while using repair as a tool to stay connected. The other options miss essential collaborative steps, rely on avoidance, or involve unilateral decisions, which undermine the collaborative problem-solving process.

In Gottman theory, solvable problems are tackled with a collaborative problem-solving sequence that keeps both partners engaged and respected. Start by stating the problem clearly in terms you both can agree on, which sets a neutral ground and reduces misunderstandings. Then brainstorm several possible solutions together, inviting input from both sides so you get a range of options rather than rushing to one fix. Next, evaluate each option by weighing its pros and cons, so you can make a choice that balances needs for both partners. After that, pick one solution to try and implement it, then review how it went after a set period. This review lets you decide whether to keep the plan, adjust it, or try a new approach. Throughout the process, repair attempts are available to de-escalate tension and keep the discussion constructive if things begin to get heated or misaligned.

This sequence fits Gottman’s approach because it emphasizes joint problem definition, exploration of multiple solutions, deliberate decision-making, and timely evaluation, all while using repair as a tool to stay connected. The other options miss essential collaborative steps, rely on avoidance, or involve unilateral decisions, which undermine the collaborative problem-solving process.